From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d8aa0b11d3c79b63 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: Re: Access to strings and string subtypes? Date: 2000/03/17 Message-ID: <2000Mar17.070235.1@eisner>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 598722539 References: <38d10a7b.91796987@news.rrds.co.uk> <38d11f2a.97092271@news.rrds.co.uk> X-Trace: news.decus.org 953294562 6698 KILGALLEN [216.44.122.34] Organization: LJK Software Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-03-17T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Ehud Lamm writes: > I had a feeling your answer is going to be something like this! I say - > always keep GNAT arround, so you can take advantage of it good error > messages, warnings etc. (It doesn't cost you, you know...) An additional piece of software _always_ costs, in terms of administration, familiarization, etc. Perhaps it is worth that cost because of GNAT's superior error messages -- that will depend on the degree of trouble the original problem caused.