From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3e2839f528cc1c40 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: Re: Project: FreeOS Date: 2000/01/14 Message-ID: <2000Jan14.120633.1@eisner>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 572642920 References: <387C8CB3.1276637F@icn.siemens.de> <85j75o$ofk$1@news08.btx.dtag.de> <387F0B20.2FC5F945@icn.siemens.de> X-Trace: news.decus.org 947869596 6464 KILGALLEN [216.44.122.34] Organization: LJK Software Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-01-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Preben Randhol writes: > Well how do you get the OS to become popular? Remember Linux was > started in 1991. I'm not so sure a new OS would be able to compete so > well against Linux. It would have to be able to run Linux apps and use > device drivers available for Linux. Otherwise not much hardware would > be supported. The ability of Linux to corner the market is limited to that segment of the market that wants a Unix-style operating system. OS/2 marks a different segment. If you provide Linux compatibility you are bound by the legacy Unix behavior, defeating the purpose of a "new" operating system. Certainly providing useful programs on existing operating systems is better.