From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a550b1f0b8a4db1f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: Re: Forget about ada and start learning something like java ,visual basic and c++ Date: 2000/02/07 Message-ID: <2000Feb7.074018.1@eisner>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 582628342 References: <389E7A31.4957D525@quadruscorp.com> <389e8bb6.617527@news.chariot.net.au> X-Trace: news.decus.org 949927223 7842 KILGALLEN [216.44.122.34] Organization: LJK Software Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-02-07T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <389e8bb6.617527@news.chariot.net.au>, groth@chariot.net.au (Gareth) writes: > My major problem with Ada is the lack of tools to create a Win95/98/NT > program with a *native* Win95/98/NT GUI. The results of ObjectAda for Windows seem quite "native" to me. > I've yet to see a freeware tool that will allow me to create a menu > system for my Ada applications (running on the Windows OS) that > actually looks like an MS Windows system. But if you restrict the available solutions to freeware, you get what freeware authors want to provide, and their tastes often will not run to the Microsoft standards.