From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a83c46b54bacb7f6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: Re: JOB:Sr. SW Engineers Wanted-Fortune 500 Co Date: 2000/02/03 Message-ID: <2000Feb3.071857.1@eisner>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 581066364 References: <3894A823.92EC75D1@bondtechnologies.com> <874b7r$mj9$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <877081$knt$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Trace: news.decus.org 949580341 8388 KILGALLEN [216.44.122.34] Organization: LJK Software Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-02-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Ray Blaak writes: > Errors will still happen, but the number of idiotic, invalid index, invalid > pointer errors that can be completely preventable just go way down. Most important to me is that inspectors cannot find any of those "easy" defects so they will be concentrating their efforts on the "hard" ones.