From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,78a1af350f4cf4b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: Re: Win2000 has 63,000 'defects' Date: 2000/02/15 Message-ID: <2000Feb15.155645.1@eisner>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 586290324 References: <38A989B7.2D4D6B56@maths.unine.ch> <87k8k69qm9.fsf@deneb.cygnus.argh.org> X-Trace: news.decus.org 950648208 17364 KILGALLEN [216.44.122.34] Organization: LJK Software Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-02-15T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <87k8k69qm9.fsf@deneb.cygnus.argh.org>, Florian Weimer writes: > 63,000 `potential known defects' (whatever this means) A news report said that number was achieved by running an automated scanner over the software. Certainly there are many defects that would not be uncovered by such a scanner.