From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a83c46b54bacb7f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: JOB:Sr. SW Engineers Wanted-Fortune 500 Co
Date: 2000/02/01
Message-ID: <2000Feb1.154122.1@eisner>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 580503635
References: <3894A823.92EC75D1@bondtechnologies.com>
 <874b7r$mj9$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <t7iu09q36i.fsf@calumny.jyacc.com>
 <38967537_1@news.jps.net> <t7n1pk6gwx.fsf@calumny.jyacc.com>
 <Z%Dl4.961$dw3.47427@news.wenet.net>
X-Trace: news.decus.org 949437685 7094 KILGALLEN [216.44.122.34]
Organization: LJK Software
Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-02-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <Z%Dl4.961$dw3.47427@news.wenet.net>, "Mike Silva" <mjsilva@jps.net> writes:

> Firstly, shortening the development process by catching more errors quicker
> is a Good Thing.  Secondly, I can imagine plenty of scenarios where software
> and/or hardware glitches can be captured, corrected in some manner (even if
> via restart) and logged in a running pacemaker, to be analysed later,
> perhaps resulting in the loading of improved code into the device (I believe
> this is possible -- it certainly should be!)

I doubt the possibility of a mechanism that would load improved code
but decline to load degredated code.  The most that can be said for
the mechanism is that it can load "different" code :-).