From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6f0ad5b8fa43069b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: anthonygair@aol.comremoveme (ANTHONY GAIR)
Subject: Re: Software Development
Date: 2000/05/07
Message-ID: <20000507094437.10742.00001809@ng-bj1.aol.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 620270667
References: <8es3sf$2q2$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
Organization: AOL, http://www.aol.co.uk
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Admin: news@aol.com
Date: 2000-05-07T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In the interests of furthering arguments for no reason,
CMM is far better than ISO9000 despite being created by the U.S.
ISO inspectors maybe are far easier to fool or bribe.
CMM actually works in a commercial environment for the benefit of the Employee.
I do however admit to stirring and smoking pots. 
Are ADA and linux a good combination :-
www.remotely.useful.com