From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,4b26cf620424a3ff
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!195.71.90.67.MISMATCH!news.unit0.net!noris.net!news.teledata-fn.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Language Revision : "/" and "div"
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: 
 <8aa58be8-a9b2-4653-8234-e5b6a70f310f@k41g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 11:25:36 +0200
Message-ID: <1wcpicfucvich$.1ec1rjytiuj5s$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 01 May 2010 11:25:36 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 8d9313e6.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=@;`L2>M3?>5U`5g[@c]@J14IUK<Cl32<14Fo<]lROoR18kF<OcfhCO;G2>67Cdc?24[6LHn;2LCV>[<mhadbfdU;UTmhC]PEPN1=iPTeFeY`_?
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:11269
Date: 2010-05-01T11:25:36+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 23:52:18 -0700 (PDT), vincent.diemunsch@gmail.com
wrote:

> I wonder why Ada uses "/" to express the integer division and not
> "div".

Because in most languages / denotes "integer division", which mathematical
integer lack (:-)).

> This leads to the fact that an expression like 4/3*6 that any decent calculator
> would evaluate as 8 is in Ada evaluated as 6 !!! That is a shame :-).

1. The calculator uses reals, not integers.
2. There exist expression which cannot be evaluated (as decimal fractions
of finite length), e.g. 1.0/3.0
3. There exist operations not closed in R. So a "decent" calculator should
return j for sqrt(-1.0) 
4. There exist operations not closed in C, e.g. multi-valued functions. A
"decent" calculator must return a set of values?

> - discard the function "/" (left, right : Integer) return Integer and
> replace it by the operator "div",

AFAIK, ARG does not introduce backward incompatibilities unless absolutely
necessary (in their opinion (:-)). I doubt that / could fall under this
category.

> that sounds quite logical with the existing "rem" and "mod".
> - add a fraction package with a function "/" (left, right :
> Integer'base) return Fraction; as constructor.

Arguably better would be "div" as a full division, e.g. returning a tuple
of the result and the remainder. In both cases there is a problem that the
result type (be it fraction, tuple, rational etc) shall be defined
(inferred) for each integer type including user-defined ones. Ada lacks any
mechanics for this.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de