From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Languages don't matter. A mathematical refutation Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 18:48:50 +0200 Organization: cbb software GmbH Message-ID: <1w9728t8k96ok.lqw8tv2490fg.dlg@40tude.net> References: <59ac455c-72f6-43e2-8a79-efc0f3e16d9a@googlegroups.com> <19qfgu5pjszm5.s5y5u8r0zx8k.dlg@40tude.net> <161a69af-a392-4214-bd92-0e20e7522cca@googlegroups.com> <1ht5q4lxmtf3p.mntbczbpti5n.dlg@40tude.net> <0ac76a41-d276-47d4-8659-530229802d12@googlegroups.com> <1ieaan02ff638.n6kjnn72tsp3$.dlg@40tude.net> <1o9qidr7413f4$.1jbc41w6r9j62.dlg@40tude.net> <1q1hq0qt8n15$.kxfdpvio0p1w.dlg@40tude.net> <88bcdf76-b09e-4995-8410-b680cabb7241@googlegroups.com> <2912d82d-3ace-495b-9017-aa5bd78604c6@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de NNTP-Posting-Host: w2sqUGEBZqsVBYNL7Ky3Kg.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:25382 Date: 2015-04-02T18:48:50+02:00 List-Id: On Thu, 2 Apr 2015 08:55:52 -0700 (PDT), brbarkstrom@gmail.com wrote: > As to whether language is the main factor in determining quality, I'm curious > as to whether there's empirical evidence about its relative importance in > the cost. One could think out some empirical model of SW process with all incoming parameters, the language included. The SW metrics taken as the output. A next step would be to verify this model against the reality. The problem is that inputs as outputs are barely measurable. So I don't think one could come up with anything more convincing than infamous climate models, but who knows. In any case what was described is a mockery of statistic. It is not uncommon, there are tons of publications of that sort, even in peer reviewed journals, but still. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de