From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,97819f4f06661130 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!87.79.20.105.MISMATCH!news.netcologne.de!ramfeed1.netcologne.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Subject: Re: Generic Containers in Ada2005 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Organization: cbb software GmbH References: Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 09:33:30 +0100 Message-ID: <1vw9tbt1xma5m.cvy6d03i25d1.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Date: 09 Feb 2011 09:33:30 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 5ce17b84.newsspool4.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=n@Ng[J85B_VHigV@eW57PQ4IUK On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 16:43:49 -0800 (PST), Bryan wrote: > I'm just curious what the reasoning was behind not providing a Queue > container? Is there some Ada philosophy behind this? I think that queue is a too specific container to be included into standard library. Depending on the number of concurrent peers accessing the queue ends, whether the queue has fixed size, whether elements are copied or referenced (e.g. statically allocated elements moved from queue to queue) the implementation and interface may sufficiently vary. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de