From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,7332b19c66a79eea X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!news2.euro.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news.netcologne.de!ramfeed1.netcologne.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Subject: Re: Quantified Expressions: "some" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Organization: cbb software GmbH References: <4ce31bb6$0$7670$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <2d44ff4d-b3ad-4593-8492-4d16fb6b6a2e@j2g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <1t7pvrh3i022d.8t9yqjonagar$.dlg@40tude.net> <4ce3e3c3$0$6987$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <13vas9njbsmps.1npsunlgz5n4z$.dlg@40tude.net> <949be87b-78a2-4e7b-8b38-40f57a69eb55@d20g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:07:31 +0100 Message-ID: <1vfx8yvlwn7g8.1lrdsplxe0f3r.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Nov 2010 11:07:32 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 0432962d.newsspool2.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=a>aRHhG@Hm:RadXUBHgFh3A9EHlD;3Yc24Fo<]lROoR18kF7enW;^6ZC`4\`mfM[68DC3\0aijlMYM@5 X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:16550 Date: 2010-11-18T11:07:32+01:00 List-Id: On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 01:48:07 -0800 (PST), AdaMagica wrote: > On 18 Nov., 09:47, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" > wrote: >> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:12:53 -0600, Randy Brukardt wrote: >>> "Dmitry A. Kazakov" wrote in message >>>news:puezn7v9naom.1nrc5rh8wzm7p.dlg@40tude.net... >>>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:14:27 +0100, J-P. Rosen wrote: >>> ... >>>>> Actually, It's been decided recently to change "|" to "=>", so it will >>>>> read: >>>>> ( for all X in 1 | 3..5 | F'Range => P(X) ) >> >>>> Not much better: "=>" means "implies." P is neither implied nor selected. >>>> Actually it is antecedent, on the left side. IF kind of X, such that P(X) >>>> AND X in the set, THEN something [ ELSE something ]. >> >>> "=>" is what SPARK uses. >> >>> I personally agreed with you and voted for neither. >> >> At least they could use "when" instead of "=>". > > ( for all X in 1 | 3..5 | F'Range when P(X) ) ????? > > That's nonsense, it's the other way round (compare exit L when ... > case X is when ...). exit when for all X in 1 | 3..5 | F'Range when P(X); does not look bad, except that "for" is misplaced. Should be exit when all X in 1 | 3..5 | F'Range when P(X); > If we are dreaming up syntax: > > Use a colon or double colon: > > ( for all X in 1 | 3..5 | F'Range :: P(X) ) Colon is usually used as : => . It should be kind of: 1 | 3..5 | F'Range : P => (others => True) -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de