From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,71d79ed4fdc42ae2
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.201.147.68.MISMATCH!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.news-service.com!news.netcologne.de!ramfeed1.netcologne.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Make specific warning error with gnat?
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: <i0hpoh$vmk$1@nntp.ilk.net> <82mxuaxmb1.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <i0kcdn$g44$1@nntp.ilk.net>
 <4c2e4d14$0$6769$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 12:00:48 +0200
Message-ID: <1v1fechw7l7k5.su72n9e0y395$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 03 Jul 2010 12:00:49 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: ce047337.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=]OASXkQ9^VN[kmHKHnaEnMMcF=Q^Z^V3H4Fo<]lROoRA8kF<OcfhCOKAVcXNaA4V6G[6LHn;2LCVN[<mhadbfdUK8KlC^Q]VOE@a<GHblNL=YB
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12161
Date: 2010-07-03T12:00:49+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 22:33:25 +0200, Georg Bauhaus wrote:

> On 7/2/10 11:44 AM, Markus Schoepflin wrote:
> 
>> I neither have the time nor the resources available to fix all of them,
>> nor am I allowed to do so. But if the compiler already knows that there
>> will be a constraint error at runtime, I would have liked the
>> compilation to fail.
> 
> (I can't think of a way to do this without annotating each
> occurrence in the source program: some programs might want
> the constraint_error to be produced for whatever reason ...)

Yep, it is called contracted exceptions! BTW.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de