From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c39ad3e35a7690a9
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.68.74.201 with SMTP id w9mr9224515pbv.0.1329123241864;
        Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:54:01 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 wr5ni19343pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!46.17.56.130.MISMATCH!rt.uk.eu.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Convention for naming of packages
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:53:56 +0100
Organization: cbb software GmbH
Message-ID: <1sx3fy79wys5s.1723nejowbg76.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <op.v9fjran9ule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <jh1ef7$26qm$1@adenine.netfront.net>
 <4f355230$0$21451$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> <jh4ev3$h3l$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <jh95ba$go0$1@dont-email.me> <op.v9k356ipule2fv@douda-yannick>
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: FbOMkhMtVLVmu7IwBnt1tw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2012-02-13T09:53:56+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:19:08 +0100, Yannick Duch�ne (Hibou57) wrote:

> Le Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:53:16 +0100, J-P. Rosen <rosen@adalog.fr> a �crit:
>> Nothing prevents you from
>> qualifying with a package name inside a use clause for that package!
> 
> And conversely, nothing prevents one to Used a package designed for "use  
> unfriendly".

Conflicting names do.

Use-friendly design requires much work for a reason, you invest at one end
to gain something at the other.

If names like This, That, Self, Object are felt satisfactory, then I have a
simpler schema:

  - parameters: A1, ..., An,
  - procedures: F1, ...,  Fn,
  - variables: V1, ..., Vn
  - types: T1, ..., Tn
  - packages: P1, ..., Pn

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de