From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,PLING_QUERY,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,b6d862eabdeb1fc4
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!87.79.20.105.MISMATCH!news.netcologne.de!ramfeed1.netcologne.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Ada noob here! Is Ada widely used?
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: <jhaJn.4661$z%6.1650@edtnps83> <op.vdtlrvrlxmjfy8@garhos>
 <yvu10n9bap55$.1occbqoi8kamk$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <hudsf0$41p$1@speranza.aioe.org> <wcchblh9uw6.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <C8306ECD.145F17%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <jie1slpi909j.152v5srl3et2y.dlg@40tude.net> <op.vdvbh7ikule2fv@garhos>
 <dde6m0poz8y2$.159jnspm6e$.dlg@40tude.net> <op.vdvdn9scule2fv@garhos>
 <d00zdxzqkpyy$.b18v6dzye2v2.dlg@40tude.net> <op.vdvk5jrdule2fv@garhos>
 <2o8vq76hpv1m.vs7m2beo23nz.dlg@40tude.net> <op.vdvpd7wpule2fv@garhos>
 <1q5k4indthpli.1dn17o4ue4a15$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4c0c1188$0$6887$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <op.vdw6zottz25lew@macpro-eth1.krischik.com>
 <4c0cd44f$0$6766$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <op.vdxkw4t2xmjfy8@garhos> <91w8y6qvtty4.16d1ujzrvbi44.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4c0cfda2$0$7653$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 17:05:59 +0200
Message-ID: <1rzybokb8zxk$.qeetinq1tmbb$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 07 Jun 2010 17:05:59 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 1bb9fa9e.newsspool1.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=?PdAAgl4FPjIkjb;<8iR=aic==]BZ:afn4Fo<]lROoRa<`=YMgDjhgbniX0T=6Vh`h[6LHn;2LCVn7enW;^6ZC`d\`mfM[68DCc2WA;@VEIDKc
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:12398
Date: 2010-06-07T17:05:59+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 16:09:37 +0200, Georg Bauhaus wrote:

> On 07.06.10 15:27, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:

>> They will rather distract from design in favor
>> debugging.
> 
> We'll see.  I still wonder why one would not want to
> specify more than the subtype constraints can achieve
> (without contorted(?) emulation of another type system).

To specify? You have used an improper word. The correct on is *to program*.
I have nothing against programming. Just don't sell me this as
specifications. They are not. And I certainly don't want *parts* of the
program being turned off by compiler switches.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de