From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Addressing in Object Ada v/s GNAT (2013) showing Vast Differences Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 18:48:54 +0200 Organization: cbb software GmbH Message-ID: <1r88k387kddye.1hpclmn13sjb2$.dlg@40tude.net> References: <26b4bb33-0ebc-4181-bea6-07f1e36ca288@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de NNTP-Posting-Host: dZFZMi8Yw0yXeelTniGFpQ.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:27806 Date: 2015-09-21T18:48:54+02:00 List-Id: On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 04:12:44 -0700 (PDT), Lucas Redding wrote: > In fact I am stumbling on portability of the rep clauses. Which is an oxymoron. Representation clauses are meant to make the code non-portable. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de