From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Someone loves PHP... Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 21:58:40 +0100 Organization: cbb software GmbH Message-ID: <1qp2ihqrtzu0m.msi8lh9wkio2.dlg@40tude.net> References: Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de NNTP-Posting-Host: Sfz0eNwKWh4Uq03iti+GMw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:28574 Date: 2015-11-27T21:58:40+01:00 List-Id: On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:31:08 +0100, G.B. wrote: > On 27.11.15 12:01, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote: >> On 11/26/2015 3:38 PM, mockturtle wrote: >>> I guess that someone here will appreciate this... >>> >>> Someone loves PHP... >>> >>> http://eev.ee/blog/2012/04/09/php-a-fractal-of-bad-design/ >>> >>> ...but not the author of the blog (as you can guess by the URL) >>> >>> Riccardo >>> >> >> According to the blog requirments of a computer language: >> >> 1) A language must be predictable. >> 2) A language must be consistent. >> 3) A language must be concise. >> 4) A language must be reliable. >> 5) A language must be debuggable. > > The length at which statements like these border on > the ridiculous becomes apparent once you test their > negations (contradictions and contraries): > > 1) A language must be unpredictable. > 2) A language must be inconsistent. > 3) A language must be verbose. > 4) A language must be unreliable. > 5) A language must be non-debuggable. > > 1) A language need not be predictable. > 2) A language need not be consistent. > 3) A language need not be concise. > 4) A language need not be reliable. > 5) A language need not be debuggable. Cannot resist, but quote Real Programmers Don't Use PASCAL "No, the Real Programmer wants a 'you asked for it, you got it' text editor - complicated, cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous." -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de