From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c733905936c6b6b0
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.202.37 with SMTP id kf5mr12401740pbc.7.1334648663175;
        Tue, 17 Apr 2012 00:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 r9ni65780pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: [OT] interesting reason why a language is considered good
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:43:33 +0200
Organization: cbb software GmbH
Message-ID: <1q608h9navsjb$.1jtnn4637u4qy$.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <jme7r1$eo7$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <1nx9eozeu6eki$.1pc7cnjtfw31w.dlg@40tude.net>
 <20765827.2166.1334645984227.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yncd8>
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: FbOMkhMtVLVmu7IwBnt1tw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-04-17T09:43:33+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:59:44 -0700 (PDT), tonyg wrote:

> On Sunday, 15 April 2012 13:27:45 UTC+1, Dmitry A. Kazakov  wrote:
>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 05:27:36 -0500, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:
>> 
>>> "The lack of reserved words in the language gives the
>>> programmer complete freedom to choose identifiers."
>>> 
>>> The above was listed under the header of what makes this
>>> language easy, robust and well defined! (I am not
>>> going to name the language).
>>> 
>>> Now, I found this to be so strange and really bizarre, as
>>> I would have thought it should be the other way round.
>>> 
>>> Reserved words are a good thing. Having an
>>> identifier be called 'if' or 'then' or 'which' is
>>> supposed to be good as it gives the programmer the freedom
>>> to choose the name of the variables?
>> 
>> Yes, or take defamatory words. What kind of identifiers they would be?
>> Clearly words like sh*t, f*ck etc must be reserved!
>>  
> They should be reserved for use in the exception handler.

Indeed. I know a programmer who is consistently using such words in the
unanticipated error messages. The only problem is that customers sometimes
see them popping! (:-))

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de