From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT GPL 2013 bug? Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 21:27:36 +0200 Organization: cbb software GmbH Message-ID: <1pe6z4dg2xk9j$.1wdn31ijaldz3.dlg@40tude.net> References: <19fr4wmxmen$.gjbias2fj461$.dlg@40tude.net> Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de NNTP-Posting-Host: akU61YSCmz18VAS8AmGZtg.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:16735 Date: 2013-08-09T21:27:36+02:00 List-Id: On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 13:55:40 -0500, Randy Brukardt wrote: > and the semantics of dispatching require that > null is excluded from controlling parameters. Why? null considered an object is not class-wide, so I see no difference to plain parameters. null.Foo would be illegal anyway and Foo (null) would be ambiguous (in presence of several overriding instances). -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de