From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,f7a7163813ae8672 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 10a146,f7a7163813ae8672 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a146,public X-Google-Thread: fa0ae,f7a7163813ae8672 X-Google-Attributes: gidfa0ae,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,f7a7163813ae8672 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-22 16:17:13 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!newspeer.cwnet.com!sjc1.nntp.concentric.net!newsfeed.concentric.net!newsfeed.ozemail.com.au!ozemail.com.au!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.perl.misc Subject: Re: Best language for low IQ programmers? From: Lyndon References: <1004990076967295@aol.com> <3be6fcf8$1@news.sentex.net> <9vdb7r$5jf$01$1@news.t-online.com> Organization: NA User-Agent: Xnews/4.06.22 Message-ID: <1o9V7.97944$li3.1014592@ozemail.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: 1cust93.tnt1.moe.au.da.uu.net X-Trace: ozemail.com.au 1009066621 63.60.195.221 (Sun, 23 Dec 2001 11:17:01 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 11:17:01 EST Distribution: world Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 00:17:01 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.c++:113567 comp.lang.java.programmer:119262 comp.lang.ada:18252 comp.lang.perl.misc:83791 Date: 2001-12-23T00:17:01+00:00 List-Id: "Christian Menke" wrote in news:9vdb7r$5jf$01$1@news.t-online.com: >> > I say, wait till someone writes a cross platform compiler for >> > English. Then you'll have a chance. >> >> I'm not so sure. Did you notice his use of English? >> Hardly a sentence without a spelling error! >> There's unlikely ever to be a compiler capable of coping with that. > > If a human brain can cope with it, it must be possible to write a > compiler capable of doing it too. > > > So you are saying the human brain is Turing machine complete :-) What if the brain's processing abilities are greater than a Turing machine?