From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,4215feeab2a8154a
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!news.weisnix.org!newsfeed.ision.net!newsfeed2.easynews.net!ision!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: C++0x and Threads - a poor relation to Ada's tasking model?
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: 
 <81a101a3-b46e-4268-973c-356c6119ee2b@c14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
  <2785ff1e-661b-41ce-95a8-cef2862e2907@b14g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
  <6239906b-e952-4bf9-8a11-b7faf942bdde@k19g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
  <Xns9C665974FB608pcc482719gmailcom@198.186.192.137>
 <270bf4df-4d0b-4621-9005-80ef8ab51634@s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com>
 <kkha8596l2r1tqs9ltrlvhof9lv2tqifoa@4ax.com>
 <wjxdil6yp6yr$.hxaonbdxi69q.dlg@40tude.net>
 <08na85tgfqucfb21lq82fug7b4ctn0astl@4ax.com>
 <owb0aenj5xv6.1qrhryqu7bp0i.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4a856d74$0$24772$4f793bc4@news.tdc.fi>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:17:47 +0200
Message-ID: <1o3fd8dx5hlo7.f7mjeuvjghll$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Aug 2009 16:17:14 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65bfd480.newsspool2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=8BCEl4bmo0[AX0F2i><W:SA9EHlD;3YcR4Fo<]lROoRQ^YC2XCjHcbY^3QAZeYME[XDNcfSJ;bb[UFCTGGVUmh?TLK[5LiR>kgR7dMd8]LcC8Y
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7786
Date: 2009-08-14T16:17:14+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:58:00 +0300, Niklas Holsti wrote:

> Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> 
>> I wonder if transputers will make a come back. Arguably a multi-core memory
>> sharing architecture is a dead end. Transputers had local memory. If they
>> return as systems with 1000 and more loosely coupled nodes (cores), what
>> will be a programming of look like? Ada's rendezvous will probably shine
>> again...
> 
> The XMOS multi-core chips look like a born-again transputer system. See 
> www.xmos.com. The CTO is David May of Transputer fame. But no Ada 
> compiler so far, it seems.

Cool! Thank you for the information! I was unaware of this.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de