From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,fa3d440109de545e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-03-14 16:02:22 PST
Path: 
 sparky!uunet!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!uw-beaver!news.u.washington.edu!stein2.u.washington.edu!bketcham
From: bketcham@stein2.u.washington.edu (Benjamin Ketcham)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: C+++, yes three pluses
Date: 14 Mar 1993 21:12:38 GMT
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <1o0746INN694@shelley.u.washington.edu>
References: <9303131341.AA22205@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: stein2.u.washington.edu
Date: 1993-03-14T21:12:38+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Actually, that should be (C++)++.  Or maybe C+=2.

But then, I always thought the original one should
be ++C.

--ben