From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,af0c6ea85f3ed92d
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.135.231 with SMTP id pv7mr21013909pbb.8.1329899089892;
        Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:24:49 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 wr5ni54496pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Arbitrary Sandbox
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:24:37 +0100
Organization: cbb software GmbH
Message-ID: <1ndcicue3jq09$.3136p653jatj.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <bfeb9869-9323-4ad5-bdf8-af20593734ef@q8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
 <2aaee0a4-e820-4a75-bbaf-d9d09c366d2c@f5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
 <4da4bf75-e6c9-4c17-9072-ab6f533ed93f@vd8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
 <jh7739$9os$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <203d63cf-42a9-49ef-82cd-943d77b5e438@c21g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
 <jhh6qr$9av$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <e10bf38c-3c48-4fa4-bb0a-e61211aee90d@f30g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
 <193cr8xol0ysi.14p4cp2yxnb0r$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <op.v9veuwe6ule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <1jleu301thnd3$.s23priwn3ajb$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <wccobswc6ob.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <18o3vqsl9uy2$.a3m68cg8ysro.dlg@40tude.net>
 <wccvcn1nl0x.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <1fkgdlidn0v80$.kjvkmk7y29vo$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <wccvcn06qve.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <o3otz4m13lh3$.53heve9256ek.dlg@40tude.net>
 <wcczkcbj35l.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: FbOMkhMtVLVmu7IwBnt1tw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-02-22T09:24:37+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:19:02 -0500, Robert A Duff wrote:

> "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:
> 
>> Consider design of a container library in Ada, which cannot broken whatever
>> the client does. I think it is possible to achieve with the corresponding
>> modifications of the language and appropriate hardware support.
> 
> We have appropriate hardware support.  You can isolate that container in
> its own process, and allow communication with it via (say) the
> Distributed Systems Annex.

No. It is a mess to "communicate" with an array.

The point is to have a platform where you could protect software components
without drawing process borders around them.

> Or you can go the pure-Java route (no JNI).

I doubt it can. Virtualization is not an answer to the problem.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de