From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,578bd4d051bc4686 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-28 06:33:36 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed.kabelfoon.nl!fi.sn.net!newsfeed2.fi.sn.net!news-stoc.telia.net!217.209.241.210.MISMATCH!news-stod.telia.net!telia.net!masternews.telia.net.!newsc.telia.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_Persson?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20031114 X-Accept-Language: sv, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: OT: GUI [was:]Ann: TeXCAD 4.1 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <1nB9c.87678$dP1.256721@newsc.telia.net> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 14:33:33 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.209.116.179 X-Complaints-To: abuse@telia.com X-Trace: newsc.telia.net 1080484413 217.209.116.179 (Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:33:33 CEST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:33:33 CEST Organization: Telia Internet Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6633 Date: 2004-03-28T14:33:33+00:00 List-Id: Since some people seem to feel that they need to defend Emacs, let me=20 make one thing clear: The post above was not about which editor is best. = It was not about mice versus keyboards. It was most definitely *not*=20 about the End key. It was about _consistency_ in user interfaces. I did=20 not say that Emacs and VI are bad. I said that _big_differences_ between = programs' user interfaces are annoying. --=20 Bj=F6rn Persson jor ers @sv ge. b n_p son eri nu