From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,229ea0001655d6a2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Subject: Re: Generic Package Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Organization: cbb software GmbH References: <1177539306.952515.222940@s33g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <1177601484.444701.171560@r35g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <9eejm6rqip.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <19qllkvm6ut42$.1iqo74vjgmsrv$.dlg@40tude.net> <1177801611.10171.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1woad6hn9idy2$.6otnwphc1o0h$.dlg@40tude.net> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 19:48:42 +0200 Message-ID: <1n38bsd8xx0uc$.1eo1arncmwvkn.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Apr 2007 19:48:23 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: cbb3d523.newsspool4.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=geO9=oON\0kf1oJaJ0@dmg4IUKcHT^>1U`DNcfSJ;bb[eIRnRBaCd_09m X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15398 Date: 2007-04-29T19:48:23+02:00 List-Id: On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:10:46 +0100, (see below) wrote: > On 29/4/07 09:19, in article 1woad6hn9idy2$.6otnwphc1o0h$.dlg@40tude.net, > "Dmitry A. Kazakov" wrote: > >> (I don't see much sense in calling loops iterators. To me the iterator is >> rather the variable of the loop. Loop performs/implements iteration.) > > Your preference (unfortunately enshrined in OO jargon) > does serious violence to English grammar! > > An or is something that performs or implements , > not something that has performed upon it! > > An actor is not a script. What about "polymorphism"? It means exactly the opposite to what its translation suggests (many-formed/shaped). -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de