From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,7178a81f7769b555 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: AdaOpenGL and AdaMultimedia References: <1190229087.588.18.camel@localhost> From: Markus E L Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 04:43:08 +0200 Message-ID: <1n1wcsoi0z.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> User-Agent: Some cool user agent (SCUG) Cancel-Lock: sha1:1Q7ZrXGU2TceRPZhW9Co8nwjT58= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.72.233.251 X-Trace: news.arcor-ip.de 1190342293 88.72.233.251 (21 Sep 2007 04:38:13 +0200) X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor-ip.de Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!club-internet.fr!feedme-small.clubint.net!news.unit0.net!newsfeed.arcor-ip.de!news.arcor-ip.de!not-for-mail Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2060 Date: 2007-09-21T04:43:08+02:00 List-Id: Poul-Erik Andreasen wrote: > Markus E L wrote: >> Alexis Muller wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> This may interest someone. I have worked on the AdaOpenGL binding. The >>> idea is to use Ada typing instead of C style (naming convention and >>> const int). I have also translate in Ada lot of samples for the opengl >>> book. You can get this work from the project's CVS >>> ( http://sourceforge.net/projects/adaopengl/ ), but I need to finish it >>> before doing a new release. >>> >>> I have also start a new project : AdaMultimedia >>> ( http://sourceforge.net/projects/adamultimedia/ ). The goal is to >>> provide a library to handle multimedia files. Like ffmpeg but in Ada ;) >>> For now it can be decode bmp pictures, AVI containers and the cinepak >>> codec. I am working on jpeg. >>> >>> Feel free to send me a mail if you what more information. >>> >>> Best regards, >> GMPGPL instead of LGPL would be nice. > > That's not a god idea since the original is a > BSD'style licens :-) Which original? And why is original-BSD-Adaversion-LGPL better than original-BSD-Adaversion-GMGPL? Whatever the "original" is here .... Regards - M