From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC, UNCLOSED_BRACKET autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,24d7acf9b853aac8 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!194.25.134.126.MISMATCH!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Subject: Re: S-expression I/O in Ada Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Organization: cbb software GmbH References: <547afa6b-731e-475f-a7f2-eaefefb25861@k8g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <4c6bc259$0$6887$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:06:33 +0200 Message-ID: <1mn7fmyjde7zu$.vhu2u2kwsyew.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Aug 2010 16:06:32 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 76eb9368.newsspool4.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=M`VT;1nb0T6kUFX=Y?aLP;4IUK[[[05 X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13608 Date: 2010-08-22T16:06:32+02:00 List-Id: On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:21:08 +0000 (UTC), Natasha Kerensikova wrote: > Then is there a simpler way to replace the object than�: > > procedure Foo is > object : Dynamic_Whatever_Array; > Computed_Size : Natural; > begin > ... > Computed_Size := ...; > ... > > declare > new_object : Dynamic_Whatever_Array(Computed_Size); > begin > -- initialize new_object contents > object := new_object; > end; > > ... > end Foo; procedure Foo is Computed_Size : Natural; begin ... Computed_Size := ...; ... declare Object : Dynamic_Whatever_Array (Computed_Size); begin -- use it Object ... end; -- Drop object ... end Foo; You don't need varying arrays in 70% cases. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de