From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b076e6315fd62dc5
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.204.154.133 with SMTP id o5mr3717639bkw.0.1337798759830;
        Wed, 23 May 2012 11:45:59 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 e27ni48113bkw.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: fyi, very interesting Ada paper OOP vs. Readability
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 20:45:56 +0200
Organization: cbb software GmbH
Message-ID: <1mmiy4uwvesby$.1qdujxobno17s.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <jodq5f$j5f$1@speranza.aioe.org> <johvef$cgg$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <1ir29foizbqv1.v9uuhpykjl3n.dlg@40tude.net> <jp0h86$6vn$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <1qkmythqujvoa$.h4megbum9r4c$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <jpdtmc$2j6$1@speranza.aioe.org> <vc1abqugagog.1bra8ltna4p2k$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <jpe4kk$l4e$1@speranza.aioe.org> <jpj8hj$lv9$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: 4RFYTQ6jM/dAKFJoI0fUkg.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-05-23T20:45:56+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:59:15 +0000 (UTC), NatarovVI wrote:

> so... between types there is no need for complicated "relations".
> inclusion, equivalence.

Traditional OO inheritance *is* inclusion. Sometimes it is called
"subsumption relation": S<:T.

> it's easily formulated by set of extending interfaces to some module.

That is extremely difficult. Showing that two types are equivalent is
undecidable.

> there is no need to formulate complex dependencies,
> and no need in OOP inheritance.

See above.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de