From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,bf02c238a92156a3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Windows Ada database support. Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 20:30:45 +0100 Organization: cbb software GmbH Message-ID: <1mmefmfb0ld12.1ahn4lp4c0nt1.dlg@40tude.net> References: <5e3e03a7.0411240431.7e037a4e@posting.google.com> <41A4DE66.40500@mailinator.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 3ip6nGIsK0Ka8eU1XgHuIg7tTtPKx/Opc10Qkxmlmoxei3guY= User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.12.1 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6431 Date: 2004-11-24T20:30:45+01:00 List-Id: On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 20:17:58 +0100, Alex R. Mosteo wrote: > Pascal Obry wrote: >> mark_doherty@yahoo.co.uk (Mark Doherty) writes: >> >>>What is the current best advice. GNADE / CLAW / GWINDOWS.Database >>>GNAVI, or something else? >> >> I would go for GNADE. AFAIK this is the only one (on the list above, not >> counting "something else" of course :) to run on GNU/Linux and Windows. I have >> lot of good experiences with GNADE (using ODBC) on both GNU/Linux and Windows. > > And I'm using the GNADE PSQL binding and it's really easy. GNADE ODBC bindings are easy. The problem is that ODBC itself ain't easy. But if you want portability across different databases there is little choice. The optimal choice could be GNADE ADBC, unfortunately, its development was stopped. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de