From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c9d5fc258548b22a X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!195.96.0.7.MISMATCH!newsfeed.utanet.at!newsfeed01.chello.at!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Subject: Re: How do I write directly to a memory address? Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Organization: cbb software GmbH References: <67063a5b-f588-45ea-bf22-ca4ba0196ee6@l11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <4d5008a5$0$6879$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <4d5031fe$0$6765$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <1f229967-d3cf-42b6-8087-c97ee08652f3@i40g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <4d51169e$0$7657$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <4d51905c$0$19486$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <36212a7b-deab-45d9-ac45-aa29cd90c7bc@o18g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <4d51a7bb$0$19486$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <4d52b489$0$19486$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <9a8njlwvey1p.1a96yvvgdf6yu.dlg@40tude.net> <4d52c5e5$0$19486$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <4d52d7d9$0$18057$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <1jf3s95v7yrkk.1m7rl9zt042py$.dlg@40tude.net> <4d52e704$0$18057$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 21:01:00 +0100 Message-ID: <1mc3d7x7npml3.ecocdmh76ljb.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Date: 09 Feb 2011 21:00:57 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: f016a274.newsspool2.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=:Pdm;5S=@QIgj[ZPFj7ehOA9EHlD;3YcB4Fo<]lROoRA8kFI2i@RmXMK5J45BH X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:18113 Date: 2011-02-09T21:00:57+01:00 List-Id: On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:12:02 -0500, Hyman Rosen wrote: > On 2/9/2011 1:36 PM, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: >> On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 13:07:19 -0500, Hyman Rosen wrote: >> >>> On 2/9/2011 12:49 PM, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: >>>> There is nothing beyond the requirements. >>> >>> You cannot use the word "requirements" as if it is simple. >>> What are the requirements of an Ada compiler? >> >> There is a certification procedure that includes conformity tests. > > So it is your claim that a piece of software which passes > the certification procedure and the conformity tests is a > correct Ada compiler? No, my claim is that it is assumed validated. >> Right, this is because having such cars is felt acceptable. > > And so is having software that is built in ad hoc ways and > written in C++ instead of Ada. Yes, this is exactly what I consider as a problem. Crashing software is felt acceptable. Food poisoning was too. Let them have it in their cars, home automation systems, TV-sets and home entertainment systems etc, and we'll see. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de