From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,9e7db243dfa070d7
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-A.news.volia.net!news.buerger.net!noris.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Do people who use Ada also use ocaml or F#?
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: 
 <b17dc7a8-7f8e-46b7-942c-b08ba83ce8fa@j25g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
 <gt9eaeq2y4pc$.11t5wghh3e8jh$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <87k4kz3mda.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
 <amlrr4wam4x6.10s9ynz9e8br$.dlg@40tude.net> <op.vlekzab8ule2fv@garhos>
 <5jjgrklivesk$.z0is5qe7mgbt.dlg@40tude.net>
 <b162afef-505e-492e-80b6-be636de6d236@y23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
 <khe570ncicmo.1qbyqnnvl4zrp.dlg@40tude.net>
 <wccpqukc50q.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 17:39:50 +0100
Message-ID: <1m8pqivlbnpot.13j7bio6linxn$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 05 Nov 2010 17:39:48 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: b7cd2523.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=h4I66XUYEQ;i6K;>iZ]7634IUK<Cl32<14Fo<]lROoR18kF<OcfhCO;@AQ0S8o`Di6[6LHn;2LCV>[<mhadbfdU;\P?OQ=Ve>f6WM_RkY_W328
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:16237
Date: 2010-11-05T17:39:48+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 08:46:13 -0400, Robert A Duff wrote:

> "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:
> 
>> How do you execute a generic body? Testable are generic instances.
> 
>     You can't test a generic without instantiating it.
>     
>     You can't test a procedure without calling it.
>     
>     You can't test an abstract type without declaring
>     a concrete type, and some objects of that type.
> 
> What am I missing?

You can't test a task without running it and some other tasks and skewing
clock and scheduler.

You can't test a protected objects without running some tasks and skewing
clock and scheduler.

You can't test clock, hmm, at all.

+ the difficulty to achieve the desired grade of test coverage.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de