From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,865c3d125a8dbc3b
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!news.albasani.net!news.gnuher.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!news.belwue.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Howto read line from a stream
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: 
 <83317a97-dae5-4c84-a1ac-88a87833cf3f@q14g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
  <1a90e055-44a3-4d00-b4cd-64798c731a55@e24g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>
 <dXEUl.125959$DP1.74148@attbi_s22>
 <709e8a12-f967-43db-b76b-4852cf1db08b@v4g2000vba.googlegroups.com>
 <pWyVl.726688$yE1.159437@attbi_s21>
 <6146a252-71e5-4aaf-9a2b-c8ee87b7c9a4@t21g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
 <08280h.f92.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
 <0033b11d-bb5f-4762-82bd-4ad7c362b72a@z9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 16:24:53 +0200
Message-ID: <1k1rqwh8z9zck.1sff011eztfxl.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 04 Jun 2009 16:24:53 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: c3797240.newsspool1.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=kXVCl=h[2eEE4ZB2flKORAic==]BZ:afN4Fo<]lROoRA^YC2XCjHcbI8`8E0EIZeUGDNcfSJ;bb[EFCTGGVUmh?DLK[5LiR>kgB3]NQ^`J:6`L
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6246
Date: 2009-06-04T16:24:53+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 06:05:25 -0700 (PDT), Maciej Sobczak wrote:

> And, to make it a bit more interesting, I have recently run a small
> interprocess communication (based of local TCP/IP) benchmark in two
> environments:
> - Mac OS
> - Windows XP in the virtual machine running on the same Mac OS
> 
> You might think that the second environment was obviously in a
> disadvantage.
> 
> To my big surprise, the second test was repeatably and consistently
> faster. Not by a large margin, but measurably (several percent).

Our measurements shown that Windows sockets (TCP/IP and PGM) function quite
good. Who could expect that from MS? (:-))

> Of course Mac OS is not Linux, so I do not want to conclude anything
> about Linux this way, but certainly I would not be terribly shocked to
> see something similar happening on Linux as well.
> Interesting, isn't it?

Rather sad.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de