From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,79d6bba6ba97b840
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.teledata-fn.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Renaming of procedures in a generic instantiation
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: 
 <f0affc67-0080-410f-9595-b91f893ec6f5@a19g2000yql.googlegroups.com>
 <8g890nFmqiU1@mid.individual.net>
 <e4e20983-55a1-4a89-91b3-806f381843f6@a36g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:04:49 +0200
Message-ID: <1juvkvto5kmzs$.wq7egldvcfat.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Sep 2010 17:04:49 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: a9d8dad7.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=coh\HW>`l=N6PJ?[X6JIXE4IUK<Cl32<A4Fo<]lROoRA8kF<OcfhCOK4g0;5gYV;i@[6LHn;2LCVN[<mhadbfdUKT6Q;:4H0E0I_OZHmM5Qb?@
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14273
Date: 2010-09-26T17:04:49+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 07:52:58 -0700 (PDT), Gene wrote:

> I've run into several cases where I
> want to implement an abstraction with minor reshaping and restriction
> of an Ada.Containers instance.  (The current one is event queues for a
> simulator.)  As you've shown above, there are some quirks in this
> approach.

Delegation (in order to implement interfaces) is poorly supported in Ada.
In real projects we have huge problems with this. About 40% of the code are
wrappers, nasty, error prone, incredibly difficult to maintain.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de