From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,763b126bf5276f4c
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.201.147.84.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!news.netcologne.de!newsfeed-fusi2.netcologne.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!noris.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Communications of ACM: Sir, Please Step Away from the ASR-33!
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: 
 <72b8fb96-2b5e-4ef8-8099-39361eeea853@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com>
 <878vzbwa61.fsf@hugsarin.sparre-andersen.dk>
 <8ns4v1Fk2dU1@mid.individual.net> <2vc8dxz8lc3t$.frc39a6lzjvt.dlg@40tude.net>
 <8ntp4kFo9qU1@mid.individual.net> <9cqhbxmdgs8x.nohduviggb5a$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4d19c37f$0$7669$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <1hd23hih9nr3v$.qzcce27pd1u1.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4d19e020$0$6885$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <1sa8js3de7m9a.1u4v3u0e8fpvy$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4d1a0531$0$6980$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <1hok68cs370tc.1lt858ruxu3m5.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4d1b3ded$0$7665$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 15:33:22 +0100
Message-ID: <1ioz1cai8u9wm$.1tddc4dxc5dzs.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Dec 2010 15:33:22 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: b1f2f452.newsspool2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=J7n>=3@N6:\5TOT9_N5i<VA9EHlD;3YcR4Fo<]lROoRQ8kF<OcfhCO[C17_l3Fi;HU[6LHn;2LCV^[<mhadbfdU[QXHj<G9fk;S]9]lgQa1lcV
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16225
Date: 2010-12-29T15:33:22+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 14:55:57 +0100, Georg Bauhaus wrote:

> On 28.12.10 17:26, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> 
>>> OTOH, using a notation that provides for any kind of
>>> message sent will ipso facto express message sending
>>> regardless of implementation (of message sending).
>>> Using source templates controlled by a programmer,
>>> the model can be mapped to a specific implementation
>>> (of message sending).
>> 
>> So simple? No multicast, unicast, acknowledges, QoS, synchronization,
>> routing, balanced load, naming and browsing services,
>> connection/disconnection, marshaling, peers, retries, frames and windows,
>> state transitions.
>> 
>> Send a message - done! Do you really believe in THIS?
> 
> Absolutely.  Understanding the model will not require
> that the model itself provides the fundament of human
> understanding.  Whenever the expression
>     "Send a message - done!"
> answers a question about the functioning of a system,
> then indeed, done!

Then we are living in two different Universes, yours is build of
antimatter. (:-))

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de