From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,587e0e0a16d65b10
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!news.netcologne.de!newsfeed-fusi2.netcologne.de!feeder.erje.net!eweka.nl!lightspeed.eweka.nl!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng2.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Invade wikipedia!
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: <l6k0og.o0o.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
 <go4gqp$5nj$1@octagram.motzarella.org> 	<gir5og.o5s.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
 <go66s6$m76$1@octagram.motzarella.org>
 	<49a6d506$0$32680$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <4a18f335-30f6-4216-8376-0310eb560445@p11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
 <49a7ced2$0$31342$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <t0tq29ariugm.aftb8vcp4aeg$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <49ae7bbf$1_1@glkas0286.greenlnk.net>
 <srtflu8nsew.hkpkh8pk8o2f.dlg@40tude.net> <49aec6cc_1@glkas0286.greenlnk.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 21:46:26 +0100
Message-ID: <1i079m2namhs2.1018t4wzdm4c0.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 04 Mar 2009 21:46:29 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2d336f02.newsspool2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=6V7iL?:4^7A6PJ?[X6JIXEA9EHlD;3YcB4Fo<]lROoRA^YC2XCjHcbI2X?Mig[YN7LDNcfSJ;bb[EIRnRBaCd<MNa01g1>^eTMIWFU9DZ\LWZB
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3951
Date: 2009-03-04T21:46:29+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 18:41:10 -0000, Stuart wrote:

> Mind you I noticed 
> that one of the C examples (for another problem) was significantly optimized 
> for a multicore system - and this was presented as the 'C' performace 
> figure.  Are the current compilers good at mapping tasks to processor cores?

That depends on too many issues. How threads / tasks are related to the
cores. Who is on control of the cores etc.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de