From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,23c0de5a42cf667e
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!news.weisnix.org!newsfeed.ision.net!newsfeed2.easynews.net!ision!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: GNAT packages in Linux distributions
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: <j5e1x31qvn1b$.11ywrjmshtauz$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <87mxw9x7no.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
 <t8liq7w6ffnm$.19yq5hkq6tdto$.dlg@40tude.net> <op.vcgi9oqzule2fv@garhos>
 <w1q9e75h9kzi.4p81vh3kannn$.dlg@40tude.net> <op.vch6dsqmxmjfy8@garhos>
 <16bz9kvbqa8y9$.155ntpwpwl29d.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4be97bea$0$2966$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> <op.vcjtnsp5xmjfy8@garhos>
 <quqkqeas8pu2$.1w5pelct29juv.dlg@40tude.net>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005121017020.21749@medsec1.medien.uni-weimar.de>
 <1p87qdlnjbufg.127laayhrw9x3$.dlg@40tude.net> <op.vclocqp9ule2fv@garhos>
 <4j73xhgimt6r$.pu55kne2p2w5$.dlg@40tude.net> <op.vc93x5wlule2fv@garhos>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 09:55:38 +0200
Message-ID: <1hxipett8xdtn$.1kqvwvmr9ic91$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 May 2010 09:55:38 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 7f18f1e0.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=7Y@L=Scf98T[7Non7UCi8UMcF=Q^Z^V3X4Fo<]lROoRQ8kF<OcfhCO[[QT]DJDV_HP[6LHn;2LCV^7enW;^6ZC`T\`mfM[68DCSIb74HWG=6BT
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11038
Date: 2010-05-26T09:55:38+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tue, 25 May 2010 22:45:31 +0200, Yannick Duch�ne (Hibou57) wrote:

> Le Wed, 12 May 2010 19:24:11 +0200, Dmitry A. Kazakov  
> <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> a �crit:
>> Yes, it is better but that is not the point. Which is there is no
>> substantial difference between Eiffel precondition and C's if statement
>> beyond syntax sugar, and that if-statement is less misleading.
> There is a major difference : Eiffel's pre/cond on methods are inherited  
> by derived class.

No, because the inheritance generates code. It is still code, rather than
error messages.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de