From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,38159b1b5557a2e7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-27 09:48:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wn11feed!worldnet.att.net!207.35.177.252!nf3.bellglobal.com!nf1.bellglobal.com!nf2.bellglobal.com!news20.bellglobal.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Warren W. Gay VE3WWG" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor References: <400A9B48.3060100@noplace.com> <400BD4B5.6000307@noplace.com> <400BDB7C.40100@noplace.com> <400D2150.6000705@noplace.com> <400E72F9.8060501@noplace.com> <100upo7ln5e3k59@corp.supernews.com> <400FC8E8.2040100@noplace.com> <_JSdna166JuxFo3dRVn-hg@comcast.com> <401115B7.5020205@noplace.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1hxRb.49223$Kg6.359365@news20.bellglobal.com> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:33:37 -0500 NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.96.223.163 X-Complaints-To: abuse@sympatico.ca X-Trace: news20.bellglobal.com 1075224765 198.96.223.163 (Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:32:45 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:32:45 EST Organization: Bell Sympatico Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4915 Date: 2004-01-27T12:33:37-05:00 List-Id: Jeffrey Carter wrote: > Warren W. Gay VE3WWG wrote: > >> Jeffrey Carter wrote: >>> One standard POSIX-Ada binding >> >> Impossible. Some UNIces provide some API structure members, >> while others don't, or provide something else again. Yes, >> you can dumb it down to a "standard" (or omit non-universal >> functionality), but by doing so you throw away functionality. >> I find that unacceptable. > > There is a standard POSIX-Ada binding (Florist is an implementation of > this standard) to the POSIX standard. If you want something not in this > standard, obviously you're going to have to provide it yourself on some > platforms. If you're on a platform that doesn't provide some of the > functionality, then it's not a POSIX system. In neither case are you > dealing with different versions of POSIX. So your message to the Ada world is that if Florist can't give you access to that O/S feature, then you should be using C? That's a progressive Ada answer. ;-) -- Warren W. Gay VE3WWG http://ve3wwg.tk