From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,1a6ba5211db88937 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!uucp.gnuu.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Subject: Re: Ada 12 times more popular than Eiffel Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Organization: cbb software GmbH References: <7bd1fd9d-6040-4f20-8e06-7ba41ca64db8@f19g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:23:43 +0200 Message-ID: <1hin5ehyjnjmz$.wg9n0ypabk6y$.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Date: 04 Jun 2009 10:23:43 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 4e003301.newsspool3.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=OeOHn6;H]Pe]BlmkiiU@BiMcF=Q^Z^V3h4Fo<]lROoRa^YC2XCjHcbi1k1BXNbGj`dDNcfSJ;bb[eFCTGGVUmh?dLK[5LiR>kgbjCWafRGUb4` X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6212 Date: 2009-06-04T10:23:43+02:00 List-Id: On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 01:01:54 -0700 (PDT), Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Here is yet another statistical proof of Ada's success as a mainstream > programming language: the thread "Ada vs Eiffel - Ada programmer > approach" had 12 different contributors here on comp.lang.ada whereas > the symmetric thread on comp.lang.eiffel had just one (the OP) and not > a single response. Therefore, there are 12 times more Ada programmers > as Eiffel programmers. I agree with the conclusion, but not with the way you came to it. (:-)) Yes it looks plausible that Ada is more popular than Eiffel, but measuring it by number of responses is barely representative. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de