From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c4cb2c432feebd9d X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,c4cb2c432feebd9d X-Google-Thread: 101deb,15c6ed4b761968e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid1094ba,gid101deb,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed2.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!newsfeed.news2me.com!sn-xt-sjc-04!sn-xt-sjc-11!sn-xt-sjc-07!sn-post-sjc-01!supernews.com!news.supernews.com!nospam From: nospam@see.signature (Richard E Maine) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.pl1 Subject: Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:28:06 -0700 Organization: NASA Dryden Message-ID: <1hib0vr.14zzwe11t6ukk0N%nospam@see.signature> References: <0ugu4e.4i7.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> <%P_cg.155733$eR6.26337@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <6H9dg.10258$S7.9150@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <1hfv5wb.1x4ab1tbdzk7eN%nospam@see.signature> <2006052509454116807-gsande@worldnetattnet> <1kzktalo9krea$.z8n9wev45xct$.dlg@40tude.net> <_5idnW0Lk4kxXS7ZnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@comcast.com> <1hiayuk.4mm8dzknzt0nN%nospam@see.signature> User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.7 (Mac OS X version 10.4.7) X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5620 comp.lang.fortran:11947 comp.lang.pl1:1987 Date: 2006-07-11T09:28:06-07:00 List-Id: Ed Falis wrote: > Richard E Maine wrote: > > I don't believe you... > > An awful lot of Fortran codes would fail compilation in that case - > > I believe he meant the Sun Java compiler - not a Sun Fortran compiler. Ah. I think you are right. I should read more carefuly myself. :-( -- Richard Maine | Good judgment comes from experience; email: my first.last at org.domain| experience comes from bad judgment. org: nasa, domain: gov | -- Mark Twain