From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,f8dc8a429208e220 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAColl SQLite Binding Installation Problem (Mac, Snow Leopard) Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 21:16:06 +0200 Organization: cbb software GmbH Message-ID: <1gtxisv83r7el.1cmys3jo09ovx.dlg@40tude.net> References: <8db55ca7-7468-4323-a3a4-f139decd2bdc@j9g2000prj.googlegroups.com> Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de NNTP-Posting-Host: 8DGk8Yfcwq32Nu5ysiNyBw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:21583 Date: 2011-08-13T21:16:06+02:00 List-Id: On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 18:05:36 +0100, Simon Wright wrote: > "Dmitry A. Kazakov" writes: > >> On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:04:07 +0100, Simon Wright wrote: >> >>> Alexander Korolev writes: >>> >>>> == To run, set the environment variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH >>>> == LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/gnatcoll/lib/gnat:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH >>> >>> Of course, on Mac OS X that would be DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH. But I don't >>> think you'll need it. In any case, you've just built static-only! >> >> Especially because the intended use of SQLite is the "amalgation" >> source file compiled and statically linked to the application. > > I don't think it's quite so clear-cut as that: > http://www.sqlite.org/amalgamation.html. > > For all we know libsqlite3.dylib was produced from the amalgamation, so > you might get the 5-10% performance improvement anyway (if you really > need it). I think that performance is not so relevant here, as the nature of SQLite, which is an embeddable RDBMS/Client. If not for this case, there is little sense to deploy SQLite at all. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de