From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bb7cc916bd63ab43
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!inka.de!peernews!news.belwue.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Performance of element access in Vector
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: 
 <0a8baaf0-19f7-40c0-a041-884e93fa7020@w39g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
  <gl3c7s$m6i$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <f7594970-ade3-4ad8-9a30-41e877da194e@m2g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:26:58 +0100
Message-ID: <1fp3pbmn4q3o5.1b0fk6lircbld.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Jan 2009 09:26:51 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: fb7c496d.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=?7Z6VI0E^Me;iVb[J9ZZP`McF=Q^Z^V3h4Fo<]lROoRa^YC2XCjHcbiaQl;?6Gb3NoDNcfSJ;bb[eFCTGGVUmh?dLK[5LiR>kgbMW:FJlGW@bf
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4420
Date: 2009-01-20T09:26:51+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:03:03 -0800 (PST), Maciej Sobczak wrote:

> The difference is, however, that it is possible to use vectors in C++
> without going into undefined behavior, whereas it seems to be
> impossible to use Vectors in Ada without being slow.

There might be something wrong with the concept they share...

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de