From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8002154d2966e1a1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-11-05 05:56:21 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!sn-xit-05!sn-xit-06!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!claveman
From: claveman@grzorgenplatz.net (Charles H. Sampson)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Local vs global variables in ADA
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 05:53:55 -0800
Organization: NetHere Inc.
Message-ID: <1fl5uz5.x1tu5v11ap2aeN%claveman@grzorgenplatz.net>
References: <5Ldx9.3695$151.38236@weber.videotron.net>
 <3DC5D1B7.1060707@acm.org>
 <PBux9.1632$Bd4.12716@dfw-service2.ext.raytheon.com> <3DC6DD54.10200@acm.org>
 <uadkov23t.fsf@FWILSON.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-shoot-me>
User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.4.6
Cache-Post-Path: 
 news-1.nethere.net!unknown@ppp-66-63-134-182.sndg-pm4-2.dialup.nethere.net
X-Cache: nntpcache 3.0.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:30381
Date: 2002-11-05T05:53:55-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Fraser Wilson <newsfraser@blancolioni.org> wrote:

> Jeffrey Carter <jrcarter@acm.org> writes:
> 
> > True. But since at the Ada launch on 1980 Dec 10, some of those people
> > said that the language contained "goto" primarily to facilitate 
> > automated translation from languages such as FORTRAN 66, and "while"
> > primarily to facilitate such translation from languages such as Pascal,
> 
> On the "while" comment: are you (or were they) referring to the fact
> that a while loop can be expressed as a loop/exit when/end loop
> construction, or is there something about while loops that should be
> avoided?  Isn't there a preference hierarchy from for loop to while
> loop to loop?  I.e. use a for loop whenever possible, failing that a
> while loop, and as a last resort a loop with an exit.  OK, and as a
> last last resort use a goto.
> 
> Fraser.

     I don't know what the "founders" intended but how's this for a
rule: Use a for-loop only when it's appropriate, use a while-loop only
when it's appropriate, use an "infinite" loop in all other cases. :-)

     Seriously, here's what I try to do: use the for-loop and while-loop
only when they express the loop's termination condition.  In other
words, do not use exit statements within loops of these forms; if a loop
requires an exit statement, then use an "infinite" loop instead.
Unfortunately, my will power is often too weak to overcome the
convenience of the automatically declared counting variable of a
for-loop.  I'm much better with while loops.

                                Charlie

-- 
     For an email response, my real user name is csampson and my ISP is
inetworld.net.