From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: a new language, designed for safety !
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 14:30:12 +0200
Organization: cbb software GmbH
Message-ID: <1f63h2p39u7oi$.tj7uwc9s8i68.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <lmj8s6$hhp$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <1402308235.2520.153.camel@pascal.home.net> <85ioo9yukk.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <ln6tlg$1vc$1@dont-email.me>
 <255b51cd-b23f-4413-805a-9fea3c70d8b2@googlegroups.com>
 <ln6uv9$bk8$1@dont-email.me>
 <b22db9fb-a73d-438a-8cfd-f0bb1db70eed@googlegroups.com>
 <MPElv.491358$1w1.428312@fx03.iad>
 <5ebe316d-cd84-40fb-a983-9f953f205fef@googlegroups.com>
 <ln7ngt$c8a$1@dont-email.me>
 <2100734262424129975.133931laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
 <lnn5ko$ner$1@loke.gir.dk>
 <665318547424646901.823673laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
 <lnnt1g$mka$1@dont-email.me> <lnpdt2$ggn$1@dont-email.me>
 <lnq5kj$e2v$1@loke.gir.dk> <lnq78k$ur8$1@dont-email.me>
 <53a127a6$0$6658$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <117hu7inluueh.8yl6k6ubrlo5.dlg@40tude.net>
 <53a15d0a$0$6619$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: QTaafVZuunHujkJPndFR7g.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:20429
Date: 2014-06-18T14:30:12+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 11:34:01 +0200, G.B. wrote:

> (Pardon? A contract is a manifest piece from the equivalence
> class of paper, signed by two parties.

And that does not defines the parties it only constrains them, which was
the point.

>> 2. You cannot have exhaustive contracts.
> 
> Writing contracts is not a just formal logic, it is about
> programmers *behaving* responsibly when programming:

Irrelevant. So long they must behave in a way that the things they write
satisfy the contract. If they do that irresponsibly, whatever.

If you are contracted to smoke one block a day, that might be irresponsible
on your side, but a contract is a contract.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de