From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9a11:: with SMTP id
 s17mr16758092iol.267.1559095038283;
        Tue, 28 May 2019 18:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:c302:: with SMTP id t2mr4872409oif.110.1559095038106;
 Tue, 28 May 2019 18:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.166.215.MISMATCH!c92no154701itd.0!news-out.google.com!p73ni72itp.0!nntp.google.com!c92no154699itd.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 18:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <f627b458-8155-43b1-8220-8524e801d389@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=108.178.227.154;
 posting-account=zwxLlwoAAAChLBU7oraRzNDnqQYkYbpo
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.178.227.154
References: <5c6d8e37-b737-4a8b-b601-0d0b4c10756b@googlegroups.com>
 <ff343399-8c00-467e-997c-0c6fb87f807a@googlegroups.com>
 <qcgpro$lmi$1@dont-email.me>
 <29e20858-6e53-4e52-a5e0-6ff7cb0d8f74@googlegroups.com>
 <f627b458-8155-43b1-8220-8524e801d389@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <1f5a3876-a27a-439a-bcf8-d24d96e437a4@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Needed - Ada 2012 Compiler.
From: Optikos <optikos@verizon.net>
Injection-Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 01:57:18 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:56394
Date: 2019-05-28T18:57:17-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Maciej Sobczak wrote:
> Optikos wrote:
> > Hence why Alex was correctly indicating that
> > GPL Community Edition forestalls most
> > practical forms of commercial business
> > activity by entirely prohibiting AdaCore-esque
> > dual licensing 
> 
> Wrong. You can write your program (or a
> library) and sell it in the form of source code
> with whatever license you wish

Certainly absolutely no one does that regarding software that is strictly GPLv3 without the Runtime Library Exception!

> Feel free to complete this scheme with any kind of NDA or other forms of legal
> agreements with your customers. 

Certainly absolutely no one does that regarding software that is strictly GPLv3 without the Runtime Library Exception!