From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b30bd69fa8f63cb2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-12 14:58:09 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: mheaney@on2.com (Matthew Heaney) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: C bug of the day Date: 12 Jun 2003 14:58:08 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <1ec946d1.0306121358.3e97731e@posting.google.com> References: <1054751321.434656@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.162.65.162 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1055455088 13536 127.0.0.1 (12 Jun 2003 21:58:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Jun 2003 21:58:08 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39067 Date: 2003-06-12T21:58:08+00:00 List-Id: Georg Bauhaus wrote in message news:... > > And what about the STL being possible with C++ only? Except > for tricky and useful compile time Lisp in C++ templates, and > ()-operator magic sugar, I don't think this is so, ask Matthew > Heaney about Charles. The statement that "STL is only possible in C++" is false. The Charles library constitutes a proof-by-counterexample. http://home.earthlink.net/~matthewjheaney/charles/ > Most of the components are licensed, not in the public domain, > at least not in the US public domain, afaict. The components in the Charles library use the GMGPL.