From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a046ce7f5ee1fa51
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-12-02 06:57:54 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: mheaney@on2.com (Matthew Heaney)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: new_line in a put_line
Date: 2 Dec 2002 06:57:54 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <1ec946d1.0212020657.2bd8b5c@posting.google.com>
References: <aserlb$juh$1@fang.dsto.defence.gov.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.162.65.162
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1038841074 1839 127.0.0.1 (2 Dec 2002 14:57:54
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 2 Dec 2002 14:57:54 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:31343
Date: 2002-12-02T14:57:54+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Vlad" <vbednikov@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message news:<aserlb$juh$1@fang.dsto.defence.gov.au>...
>
> Is there a way of prepending a new_line to a put_line.
> The reason I need this is that I have multiple tasks outputing to a\
> single file. Some of them use Text_IO.Put rather then Text_IO.Put_Line.
> And because of this, some of these outputs get written on the same line
> as my outputs.

If you have multiple tasks writing to the same file, then you're going
to have to synchronize access to the file through some intermediary,
as a task or protected object (the latter requires care).  Therefore,
there should already be a layer between Text_IO and the writing tasks,
which means that you can insert whatever extra code (e.g. a call to
New_Line) you deem necessary.