From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,163994d4f34e92d0 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.66.80.166 with SMTP id s6mr1829683pax.30.1344322789437; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 23:59:49 -0700 (PDT) Path: g9ni142284pbo.0!nntp.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!ctu-peer!ctu-gate!news.nctu.edu.tw!usenet.stanford.edu!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Patrick Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: how to tell gnatmake to send executables to a different directory when compiling multi source? Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 08:14:55 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1eb01749-1134-4baf-9adf-19d0a2792890@googlegroups.com> References: <5dcd485b-1d0e-4d39-bae7-71b3525716fb@googlegroups.com> <2e578fbe-5271-4a6a-905b-1cf4669eb5ce@v9g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.53.16.194 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1343748495 28102 127.0.0.1 (31 Jul 2012 15:28:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 15:28:15 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <2e578fbe-5271-4a6a-905b-1cf4669eb5ce@v9g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=70.53.16.194; posting-account=cUi90woAAADTaOISowbbHM8GUD0-opJO User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Received-Bytes: 2185 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: 2012-07-31T08:14:55-07:00 List-Id: Hi Ludovic Yep, GCC looks really scary and I am sure if you want your compiler include= d in it, you have to do scary stuff too. What I am trying to say is that the GNAT project that Adacore is releasing = directly to the public could have the option to build from GPR if possible = and if not, it could fall back on Makefiles. I don't think it would be so h= ard to take a logically designed set of directories and then dump all the c= ode out into one folder to hand over to the FSF people for GCC. =20 I see what you are saying about gnatmake being separate but since Ada needs= another version of Ada to compile, that computer might have gnatmake insta= ll already and if not then falling back on makefiles could work, no?