From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,73cb216d191f0fef X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Received: by 10.180.183.84 with SMTP id ek20mr1119173wic.0.1363280915566; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:08:35 -0700 (PDT) X-FeedAbuse: http://nntpfeed.proxad.net/abuse.pl feeded by 78.192.65.63 Path: g1ni65732wig.0!nntp.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!nntpfeed.proxad.net!news.muarf.org!news.ecp.fr!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is this expected behavior or not Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:08:28 +0100 Organization: cbb software GmbH Message-ID: <1e6z45fpgobf9$.1v75d8nu2bq6t$.dlg@40tude.net> References: <8klywqh2pf$.1f949flc1xeia.dlg@40tude.net> <513f6e2f$0$6572$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <513faaf7$0$6626$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <51408e81$0$6577$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <1xqmd3386hvns.1og1uql2cgnuf$.dlg@40tude.net> <5140b812$0$6575$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <5140f1ad$0$6634$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <7jct0noryc1v.1rnj5kkzx6m35.dlg@40tude.net> <5141c499$0$6642$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <18r2kop6fyozu.tctrjnghfxqs.dlg@40tude.net> <9fdb6a77-aea8-4cb6-aebd-2dd7d3baaefa@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de NNTP-Posting-Host: pQ928Up2OZ3uIq9RKW9GMg.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 2013-03-14T18:08:28+01:00 List-Id: On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:22:40 -0700 (PDT), Shark8 wrote: > On Thursday, March 14, 2013 8:26:56 AM UTC-6, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: >> On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:37:44 +0100, Georg Bauhaus wrote: >> >>>> We don't talk about Positive'Base. We do about Positive. >>> >>> Positive'Succ does *not* declare parameters whose subtype is Positive. >> >> Surely it does. Proof: >> >> X : Positive := 1; >> Y : Positive := Positive'Succ (X); >> >> Either Ada is untyped or else Positive'Succ is effectively defined on >> Positive and returns Positive. > > Objection! [...] The code is before your eyes. Operation is called on a Positive => Positive has this operation. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de