From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6322b2f76bf30f06 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: claveman@inetworld.net (Charles H. Sampson) Subject: Re: Was: Re: Ada95 in Germany Date: 2000/01/15 Message-ID: <1e4fwmu.zr0wn81gy60wsN%claveman@inetworld.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 573018508 References: <387B3F2C.52272A82@frqnet.de> <85ki75$rne$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <387DDCCD.100F2747@frqnet.de> <387DDEFC.58BE357F@rrds.co.uk> <387EF919.6C7E9092@nokia.com> <387F8860.3709F284@quadruscorp.com> X-Trace: newsfeed.slurp.net 947956117 209.132.126.68 (Sat, 15 Jan 2000 11:08:37 CDT) User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.4.2 NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 11:08:37 CDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-01-15T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Marin D. Condic wrote: > I had heard tell of some project the FAA was doing in Ada which failed > (as does my aging memory!). However, project failure is often more an > issue of bad planning and management than it is the language of > implementation. ... I think you're referring to the failed attempt a few years ago to develop a new air traffic control system for the U. S. A division of my company was the software subcontractor for the project, which was large- ly in Ada. It's my understanding that when the project was shut down, the manager (from the prime contractor, another company) volunteered that the choice of programming language was not the cause. I'm writing from memory of informal chats with colleagues 3000 miles away, but, from what I heard, it was a classic case of not stabilizing requirements. Charlie -- To get my correct email address, replace the "claveman" by "csampson" in my fake (anti-spam) address.