On Wed, 20 Aug 2025, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|"On 2025-08-20 19:18, Niocláisín Cóilín de Ghlostéir wrote:             |
|                                                                        |
|> So Ada is not an OOP language. Cf. Professor Alan Curtis Kay says:    |
|                                                                        |
|To be clear, I don't care what Prof. Kay says."                         |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Please stop misusing a term which Prof. Kay coined. If you do not care 
about what Prof. Kay says, then you do not care about object orientation. 
It is fair enough for some person to not care about object orientation. 
Instead, incorrectly boasting about being an OO expert who writes in an OO 
language when this languague - Ada - is not an OO language is a bad idea, 
so please stop so.

|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|"> Cf. a Smalltalk superclass can receive a subclass message for which no|
|> superclass counterpart exists, so causing a crash. OOP is poop!        |
|                                                                         |
|I care even less about Smalltalk. It is about Ada. I explained that your |
|suggestion about Ada subclasses evidently wrong."                        |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|

I made no "suggestion about Ada subclasses" in this thread, as I clearly 
referred to an OOP language so clearly excluding Ada. Indeed, you actually 
quote me saying: "So Ada is not an OOP language."!