From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newspeer1.nac.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!news.stack.nl!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada platforms and pricing, was: Re: a new language, designed for safety ! Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 22:20:39 +0200 Organization: cbb software GmbH Message-ID: <1dk69p0vehpcz$.32c9ipnkg2ey$.dlg@40tude.net> References: <1402308235.2520.153.camel@pascal.home.net> <85ioo9yukk.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <255b51cd-b23f-4413-805a-9fea3c70d8b2@googlegroups.com> <5ebe316d-cd84-40fb-a983-9f953f205fef@googlegroups.com> <2100734262424129975.133931laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org> <1vrc8mmlbvd6f$.1vak7oiubwsaj$.dlg@40tude.net> Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de NNTP-Posting-Host: qHNcUCBwwd01dPSBp/L1cg.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:187206 Date: 2014-06-23T22:20:39+02:00 List-Id: On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 15:08:47 -0500, Randy Brukardt wrote: > "Dmitry A. Kazakov" wrote in message > news:1vrc8mmlbvd6f$.1vak7oiubwsaj$.dlg@40tude.net... >> On Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:38:50 -0500, Randy Brukardt wrote: >> >>> I'm not talking about "peripherals"; I'm talking about timers and trap >>> handlers (for overflow, divide-by-zero, etc.) and the like. These things >>> are >>> required for a useful subset of Ada. (No clock and no exceptions means >>> you're no longer really doing Ada, just Ada syntax.) I/O is optional, but >>> not these other things. >> >> You are right. But how a board could be of any use without some peripheral >> I/O? Especially when file I/O and networking has already been ruled out! >> Deaf-mute chunk of silicon... > > Right, but I was thinking of the rather elaborate language-defined I/O > facilities. I doubt that there is much use for Ada.Directories on the > typical embedded board. It is rather common to have a USB flash attached, formatted FAT or something. So Ada.Directories is not so outlandish as it may appear... -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de